Corbett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MONTIQUENO CORBETT, individually Case No.: 3:21-cv-00137-JES-AHG and on behalf of all others similarly ORDER RESOLVING OPPOSED situated, et al.,

JOINT MOTION FOR

14 Plaintiffs, CONTINUANCE 15 v. [ECF No. 208]

PHARMACARE U.S., INC.,

17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Before the Court is the parties’ Opposed Joint Motion to Continue. ECF No. 208. Plaintiffs seek a continuance of the merits expert disclosure deadlines, which Defendant opposes. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order, or other deadlines set forth by the Court, must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 170 at 6 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). Courts have broad discretion…