Charman
Charman v. Core Digital Marketing LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THANE CHARMAN, an individual, Case No.: 23-CV-995 JLS (AHG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CORE DIGITIAL MARKETING LLC,
D/B/A HIGH END CLIENT, a Ohio LLC; (ECF No. 11) KENT LITTLEJOHN, an individual; MATTHEW BARCUS, an individual, Defendants. 18 Presently before the Court is the ex parte Request for Extension to Respond to Complaint (“Req.,” ECF No. 11) filed by Defendants Kent Littlejohn and Mattew Barcus (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants, acting pro se, seek a 60-day extension to answer Plaintiff Thane Charman’s Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl., ECF No. 6). Plaintiff has not responded to the Request. See Docket. Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint on October 17, 2023. See Am. Compl. The Court issued an amended summons on October 24. See ECF No. 7. Plaintiff then returned an executed …