Hernandez

Hernandez v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20233:21-cv-00225California6,170 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON HERNANDEZ, Case No.: 21-CV-225-SBC

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION This action arises from the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of Ramon Hernandez’s (“Plaintiff”) application for disability insurance benefits under Title II and Part A of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (“Act”). Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. Nos. 13, 14.) Specifically, Plaintiff requests a sentence six remand for further administrative proceedings to reconcile the Commissioner’s initial unfavorable decision with its subsequent favorable decision. 42 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.