McNeil

McNeil v. San Diego Sheriffs

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20233:23-cv-02199California1,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ROY MCNEIL, Case No.: 23-CV-2199 JLS (BLM)

CDCR# BV-9170,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS

BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); SAN DIEGO SHERIFFS, et al., AND 16 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)

20 (ECF Nos. 1, 2) 21 Plaintiff James Roy McNeil, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights were violated by Defendants while he was being held at the George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”) in San Diego County. Compl. at 1–3. / / / / / / LEGAL STANDARD All parties instituting any civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.