McNeil
McNeil v. San Diego Sheriffs
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ROY MCNEIL, Case No.: 23-CV-2199 JLS (BLM)
CDCR# BV-9170,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS
BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); SAN DIEGO SHERIFFS, et al., AND 16 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE
REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)
20 (ECF Nos. 1, 2) 21 Plaintiff James Roy McNeil, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights were violated by Defendants while he was being held at the George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”) in San Diego County. Compl. at 1–3. / / / / / / LEGAL STANDARD All parties instituting any civil…