Glenn

Glenn v. Dexcom, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20233:22-cv-01866California1,286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} TYLER GLENN, Case No.: 22-cv-1866-JO-MMP Plaintiff, 13 || v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S || DEXCOM, INC. RECONSIDERATION Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Tyler Glenn moves for reconsideration [Dkt. 27] of the Court’s Orde 21 || denying Plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state court. Dkt. 25. For the reason 22 || stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs request for reconsideration. 23 /// 25 || /// 26 27 28 || ///

I. BACKGROUND On November 23, 2022, Plaintiff filed a products liability action against Defendant 3 || Dexcom, Inc., a citizen of California, in state court. Dkt. 6, Ex. A. On November 28, 2022, prior to receiving service of the complaint, Defendant filed a notice of removal on basis of diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff then served Defendant with the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.