Aychillhum
Aychillhum v. SSI
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARSHA AYCHILLHUM, Case No. 23-cv-01341-BAS-DDL
Plaintiff, ORDER:
(1) GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 3);
SSI,
(2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
WITH LEAVE TO AMEND;
Defendant. AND
(3) DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL
18 (ECF No. 2)
19 Plaintiff Marsha Aychillhum is self-represented. She filed this lawsuit concerning her SSI—Supplemental Security Income. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”)—without paying the filing fee—and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. (ECF Nos. 2, 3.) For the reasons explained below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP, dismisses her Complaint with leave to amend, and denies without prejudice the Motion to Appoint Counsel. I. Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a litigant who because of indigency is unable to pay proceed without making such payment. The determination of indigency falls…