Estate of Ronnie Kong v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20233:22-cv-01858California831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF RONNIE KONG, by and Case No. 22-cv-1858-BAS-DDL through successor in interest, Touch 12 Kong; TOUCH KONG, an individual, ORDER: (1) IMPOSING MONETARY Plaintiffs,

SANCTIONS,

14 v. (2) SETTING STATUS HEARING RE:

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; SAN DIEGO

TERMINATING SANCTIONS

POLICE DEPARTMENT; ANDREW

CAMPBELL; CHRISTOPHER LUTH;

17 and TONY MARASCHIELLO, 18 Defendants. 19 On November 28, 2022, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action. (ECF No. 1.) On February 14, 2023, Counsel substituted in to represent Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 4.) When Counsel failed to arrange for the Complaint to be served in a timely manner, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why the case should not be dismissed for a failure to prosecute and a failure to timely serve pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 5.) The Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause no later than March 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.