Canales

Canales v. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20233:23-cv-01059California2,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:23-cv-1059-GPC-MSB

ANGEL CHRISTOPHER CANALES,

CDCR# AT-3557, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiff,

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

14 v. PURUSANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b)

JEFF MACOMBER, CAPTAIN

BOTELLO, B. STUMP, JOHN DOE #1, FIDENIO GUZMAN, Warden, 17 Defendants. 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Angel Christopher Canales (“Plaintiff” or “Canales”), an inmate at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”) and proceeding pro se, filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 2, 2023. ECF No. 1. On August 22, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim and granted Plaintiff leave to amend. ECF No. 7. On November 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.