Monahan

Monahan v. Dexcom, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20233:22-cv-01872California1,290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || JOHN MONAHAN, Case No.: 22-cv-1872-JO-MMP Plaintiff, 13 || V. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S pexcom.ne, MOTION FOR Defendant. 16 . 18 19 Plaintiff John Monahan moves for reconsideration [Dkt. 28] of the Court’s Orde 21 || denying Plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state court. Dkt. 26. For the reason: 22 || stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration. 23 || /// /// /// 26 /// ///

I. BACKGROUND On November 23, 2022, Plaintiff filed a products liability action against Defendant ||Dexcom, Inc., a citizen of California, in state court. Dkt. 7, Ex. A. On November 28, 4 |) 2022, prior to receiving service of the complaint, Defendant filed a notice of removal on ||the basis of diversity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.