Iula

Iula v. Voos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20233:23-cv-02277California3,914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN MARY ASALONE IULA, Case No.: 23-CV-2277 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING APPLICATION TO JAMES VOOS,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendant. (ECF No. 2);

16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF

18 No. 1); AND 19 (3) DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 3)

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Karen Mary Asalone Iula’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Appl.,” ECF No. 2), and Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“TRO Mot.,” ECF No. 3). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s submissions and the law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Application, DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint, and DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.