Morgan
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MORGAN, an individual, Case No.: 20-cv-574-GPC-AHG MICHAEL BEVAN, an individual; 12 individually, and on behalf of others ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND similarly situated,, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION
Plaintiffs,
v. [ECF No. 162] ROHR, INC., a corporation; HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND, d/b/a UTC
AEROSPACE
SYSTEMS d/b/a COLLINS
AEROSPACE; UNITED
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
20 Defendants.
22 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for decertification. ECF No. 162. 23 For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART.
27 BACKGROUND The facts have been recited numerous times at this point in the litigation. Aside from providing a brief introduction, the Court reserves discussion of the facts until they become relevant. The Court certified five class claims as to union employees: First and Second Meal Period…