Roditi

Roditi v. New River Investments Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20233:20-cv-01908California3,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL RODITI and VENICE Case No.: 3:20-cv-01908-RBM-MSB

BEJARANO,

ORDER REGARDING ISSUES

Plaintiffs, IDENTIFIED IN JOINT PRETRIAL v. ORDER

NEW RIVER INVESTMENTS INC., et [Docs. 98] al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On June 1, 2021, Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint. (Doc. 29 (“FAC”).) On December 7, 2023, the parties filed their Proposed Joint Pretrial Order (“PTO”). (Doc. 98.) The PTO identified several issues in dispute. (Id. at 3, 4 n.1, 6 n.2 & 3.) First, Defendants objected to Plaintiffs’ claim that Defendants failed to use reasonable care because it was not plead in Plaintiffs’ FAC. (Id. at 3.) Second, Plaintiffs objected to Defendants’ unjust enrichment defense because it was not asserted in their answer to Plaintiffs’ FAC. (Id. at 4 n.1.) Third, Plaintiffs objected to two of Defendants’ witnesses—Samantha Powell and Morgan Stanley’s Person Most Knowledgeable—because …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.