Ritchie
Ritchie v. Hill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAQUIN RITCHIE, Case No.: 23-CV-2163 JLS (VET)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. RENEWED APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT
ALLYSON HILL and GOLDEN
WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR
CREDIT UNION,
COSTS Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 6) 17 18
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Joaquin Ritchie’s Renewed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“Renewed IFP Appl.,” ECF No. 6). In its December 5, 2023 Order (the “Order,” ECF No. 3), the Court denied Plaintiff’s Prior IFP Application (“Prior Appl.,” ECF No. 2) and dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) for failing to pay the required filing fee. Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s submissions and the law, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Renewed IFP Application. / / / / / / DISCUSSION All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or…