Cruz
Cruz v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIANA CRUZ, Case No.: 23-cv-874-L-KSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY
v. MOTIONS [Doc. Nos. 47, 48]
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.,
15 Defendants.
17 Two joint discovery motions are presently before the Court. Doc. Nos. 47, 48. The 18 two motions address the issues of (a) whether defendant needs to produce complete wage 19 statements for class members [Doc. No. 47]; and (b) whether the parties will engage in a 20 Belaire-West opt-out notice1 prior to production of the class list [Doc. No. 48]. Defendant 21 also filed an objection. See Doc. No. 49. The thrust of defendant’s objection is that plaintiff 22 23 24 Belaire-West or Belaire notice takes its name from Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court, 149 Cal. App. 4th 554 (2007); see also Williams v. Superior Court, 3 Cal. 5th 531, 553 (2017) (describing the history of Belaire notice and summarizing the 26 procedure). The crux of a Belaire notice is that, before…