Limpin

Limpin v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20243:23-cv-00399California510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES ex rel. MELCHOR Case No.: 23-cv-0399-DMS-DEB

KARL T. LIMPIN,

ORDER RESPONDING TO

Plaintiff, REFERRAL NOTICE v. 14 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Relator Melchor Karl T. Limpin, proceeding pro se, brings this qui tam action against California Governor Gavin Newsom, California State Senate President pro tempore Toni G. Atkins, Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, various Doe individual defendants and their respective employers for colluding to violate the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by permitting “unauthorized foreigners” to obtain COVID-19 relief, file tax returns, and receive Medicaid benefits. On April 5, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 6.) On October 24, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel and granted the United States’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 28.) Accordingly, the Court denied Plaintiff’s pending motions as moot. (Id.) On December 7, 2023,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.