Schroeder

Schroeder v. City of Vista

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20233:22-cv-01898California652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY SCHROEDER, on behalf of Case No.: 3:22-cv-01898-JO-AHG himself and other similarly situated ORDER GRANTING JOINT individuals,

MOTION TO VACATE

13 Plaintiff, MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND PRETRIAL v.

CONFERENCE DATES

CITY OF VISTA,

[ECF No. 31] Defendant.

18 19

21

23

25 26

28 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Mandatory Settlement Conference and Pretrial Conference Dates, and Set Case Management Conference; or in the Alternative, Continue Dates by Sixty Days. ECF No. 31. Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.