Morgan

Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20233:20-cv-00574California10,848 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MORGAN, an individual; Case No.: 20-cv-574-GPC-AHG MICHAEL BEVAN, an individual; 12 individually and on behalf of all others ORDER: similarly situated, 1) GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs,

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and ROHR, INC., a corporation; HAMILTON

SUNDSTRAND, d/b/a COLLINS 2) GRANTING IN PART AND

AEROSPACE; UNITED

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,

MOTION FOR PARTIAL

Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

20 [ECF Nos. 163, 164] 21 Pending before the Court is Defendants Rohr, Inc.; Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation; and United Technologies Corporation’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. ECF No. 163. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition, (ECF No. 173), and Defendants filed a Reply, (ECF No. 178). Also pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.