Drake

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDISON CORPUZ, individually and on Case No. 22-cv-1085-MMA (JLB) behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 et al., ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST Plaintiffs,

AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 v. [Doc. No. 70]

BAYER CORPORATION,

16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant Bayer Corporation’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Edison Corpuz, Deniece Drake, and Deborah Bowling’s (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint. Doc. No. 70. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, Doc. No. 74, and Defendant replied, Doc. No. 77. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 78. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND This putative class action involves…