Constellis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO JOHNSON, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-02066-W-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE

THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND

CONSTELLIS, an unknown business

RELATED DATES

entity; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

[Doc No. 14] Defendants.

19 Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Discovery Cutoff and Related Dates (the “Joint Motion”). Doc. No. 14. Therein, the parties propose extending seven dates or deadlines. Id. at 2. Based on a review of the Joint Motion and the record, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Joint Motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD In determining whether to modify a scheduling order, the Court considers the “good cause” standard set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4). Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(4), a “schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.”…