Ewing
Ewing v. Rogers
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON A. EWING, Case No.: 23-CV-1379-CAB-SBC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING OBJECTION TO
v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDERS
CHARLES C. ROGERS and CHUCK “BUCK” ROGERS REALTY, INC., [Doc. No. 24] 15 Defendants. 16 17 The Court is in receipt of a document from Plaintiff captioned “Notice of Appeal of Orders at ECF Nos. 19 and 23, to District Judge.” [Doc. No. 24.] The document appears to be an objection to two orders of Magistrate Judge Chu (1) denying Plaintiffs’ motions for sanctions and (2) following a discovery conference with the parties. Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s objection and of the docket in this case, the Court finds that the orders in question concerned case management matters squarely within the discretionary purview of the Magistrate Judge. See Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404 (9th Cir. 2010) (“It is well established that district courts have inherent power to control 26 …