Ewing

Ewing v. Rogers

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20243:23-cv-01379California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON A. EWING, Case No.: 23-CV-1379-CAB-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING OBJECTION TO

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDERS

CHARLES C. ROGERS and CHUCK “BUCK” ROGERS REALTY, INC., [Doc. No. 24] 15 Defendants. 16 17 The Court is in receipt of a document from Plaintiff captioned “Notice of Appeal of Orders at ECF Nos. 19 and 23, to District Judge.” [Doc. No. 24.] The document appears to be an objection to two orders of Magistrate Judge Chu (1) denying Plaintiffs’ motions for sanctions and (2) following a discovery conference with the parties. Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s objection and of the docket in this case, the Court finds that the orders in question concerned case management matters squarely within the discretionary purview of the Magistrate Judge. See Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404 (9th Cir. 2010) (“It is well established that district courts have inherent power to control 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.