Kinsale Insurance Company v. Benchmark Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20243:23-cv-00079California3,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 23-cv-00079-DMS-DEB

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENCHMARK INSURANCE

COMPANY,

14 Defendant.

17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kinsale Insurance Co.’s (“Kinsale” or 18 “Plaintiff”) motion for partial summary judgment (Pl.’s motion for partial summary 19 judgment (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 19.) Defendant Benchmark Insurance Co. 20 (“Benchmark” or “Defendant”) filed its response in opposition (Defendant’s Opp’n 21 (“Opp’n”), ECF No. 21). Plaintiff filed a reply. (Pl.’s Reply, ECF No. 23). For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment.1 23 24 25 1 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. Upon review of the response, the Court finds that there…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.