Meyer

Meyer v. County of San Diego

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20243:21-cv-00341California7,431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Case No.: 21-cv-341-RSH-BLM WILLIAM MEYER, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT DR.

SHALON NIENOW AND ELIZABETH

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

REESE TO PROVIDE FURTHER

Defendants. RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY

[ECF No. 153]

16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs William Meyer and Dana Gascay’s November 10, 2023 Motion to Compel Defendant Shalon Nienow and Elizabeth Reese to Provide Further Responses to Discovery (“Motion”) [ECF No. 153], Defendant Dr. Shalon Nienow and Defendant Elizabeth Reese’s (“Defendants”) November 17, 2023 Joint Opposition (“Oppo.”) [ECF No. 158], and Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Motion (“Reply”). ECF No. 164. After reviewing Plaintiffs’ Motion and Reply, Defendants’ Oppo., and all supporting documents, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs’ Motion for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.