Lopez

Lopez v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20243:23-cv-00429California1,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CRISTIAN LOPEZ, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00429-L-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO SEAWORLD PARKS & AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER, and

ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

16 (2) ISSUING SECOND AMENDED Defendant. SCHEDULING ORDER

18 [ECF No. 33] 19 20 21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to extend discovery deadlines and amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 33. The parties seek an order from the Court extending certain discovery deadlines by approximately 30 to 60 days. Id. at 4. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 22 at 8 (Amended Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.