Vinck

Vinck v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20243:19-cv-00715-W-LRCalifornia597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ROSEMARY V., Case No.: 19-cv-715 W (LR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION [DOC. 32]; AND (2) GRANTING KILOLO KIJAKAZI,2 Acting

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

Commissioner of Social Security, UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [DOC. 27] Defendants 18 19 20 21 22 23 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (See Motion [Doc. 27].) On May 26, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), recommending the Court (1) grant the motion (2) award the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC $14,000 in attorney’s fees, and (3) order the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC to reimburse Plaintiff Rosemary V. $4,212.59 for previously-awarded EAJA fees. (Report [Doc. 32] 7:22–27.) The Report also ordered any objections filed no later than June 12, 2023,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.