Douglas

Douglas v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20243:22-cv-00884California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK C. DOUGLAS, Case No.: 22-CV-884-JLS (BGS)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v.

REQUEST FOR LEAVE FOR

RICK HILL, Warden, et al., DISCOVERY Respondents. (ECF No. 29) 16 Presently before the Court is Petitioner Patrick C. Douglas’ Request for Leave for Discovery (“Request,” ECF No. 29). In its December 5, 2023 Order (“Order,” ECF No. 27), the Court denied Petitioner’s First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“FAP,” ECF No. 17) and issued a Certificate of Appealability as to all claims. The Clerk entered judgment on December 6. See ECF No. 28. One week later, the Court received the Request from Petitioner. See Request. The envelope filed alongside the Request indicates that Petitioner mailed the Request on December 10—after this Court entered its judgment. See Request at 20. Petitioner then filed a Notice of Appeal of this Court’s judgment. ECF No. 30. 26 27 28 1 All citations to the Request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.