Cabrales

Cabrales v. Bae Systems San Diego Ship Repair, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20243:21-cv-02122California918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FEDERICO CABRALES and Case No.: 21-cv-02122-AJB-DDL TYCHICUS STANISLAS, individually and on behalf of others similarly ORDER situated,

13 Plaintiffs, (Doc. Nos. 151, 156) 14 v.

BAE SYSTEMS SAN DIEGO SHIP

REPAIR, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant. 18 Presently pending before the Court are Defendant BAE Systems San Diego Ship 19 Repair, Inc.’s Ex Parte Motion for Order Approving Supplemental Settlement 20 Communication to Class Members and Allowing Additional Time for Consideration, (Doc. 21 No. 151), and Plaintiffs Federico Cabrales and Tychicus Stanislas’s (collectively, 22 “Plaintiffs”) Ex Parte application for the Court to not consider Defendant’s Reply in 23 support of its Ex Parte Motion for Order Approving Supplemental Settlement 24 Communication to Class Members and Allowing Additional Time for Consideration, or in 25 the alternative, for leave to file a sur-reply in response to Defendant’s Reply. (Doc. No. 26 156.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.