Larson
Larson v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRI LARSON, JAMESON JAUKEN, Case No.: 3:23-CV-01238-L-BGS
CHARLES KADLUBOWSKI, GEORGE
WERNER, MARTHA VELASQUEZ, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DAVID JOSEPHSON, CAROL STAY OR DISMISS AS MOOT HARDIFER, CARMINE D'AMATO, 14 CAROL ALLEN, CATHERINE DAVIS, [ECF No. 7] STACY REISER, SUNGWON HAN, ARIKA KUHLMANN, and RIC 16 HEATON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., a California 21 corporation, and HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD, a foreign corporation, 23 Defendants.
25 Pending before the court is a motion to stay the complaint, or in the alternative 26 dismiss for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint 27 (ECF No. 11.) See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is 28 ||denied as moot. See Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. ||2015). Further, the motion to stay is also denied as moot as…