Ndandu

Ndandu v. Golden State Annex Detention Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20243:23-cv-00792California2,769 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRESOR NDANDU, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00792-WQH-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. OFFICER SASSO; OFFICER

GONZALEZ; LIEUTENANT

YATES; DETENTION

WARDEN, Defendants. HAYES, Judge: I. BACKGROUND On April 26, 2023, Plaintiff Tresor Ndandu (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights Complaint against Defendant Golden State Annex (ICE) Detention Center, a privately-operated federal detention facility. (ECF No. 1.) On the same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis”) (ECF No. 2) and Request for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3). On May 18, 2023, the Court issued an Order granting the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, denying the Request for Appointment of Counsel, and sua sponte dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 5; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.