Hernandez

Hernandez v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20233:22-cv-01573California4,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL H., Case No.: 22-cv-1573-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting [Dkt. No. 14] Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

On October 13, 2022, Plaintiff Daniel H. (“Plaintiff” or “claimant”) filed a complaint challenging Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of his application for disability benefits. Dkt. No. 1. Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to reverse and remand (“Motion”) and the Commissioner’s opposition thereto (“Opposition”). Dkt. Nos. 14, 16. After carefully considering the parties’ briefing, the certified administrative record (“AR”) and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the Commissioner’s determination is free of legal error and supported by substantial evidence. For the reasons explained further below, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s decision and DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.