Earle

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Earle

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20243:22-cv-01914California818 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:22-cv-01914-H-SBC

COMMISSION,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, JOSEPH R. EARLE, JR.’S REQUEST v. TO STAY

JOSEPH R. EARLE, JR., BARRY D.

15 REAGH, WILLIAM CLAYTON, [Doc. No. 76.] FRANCIS T. DUDLEY, STEVEN E.

BRYANT, UPPER STREET

17 MARKETING, INC., and PROJECT GROWTH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. 20 On December 5, 2022, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint against Defendants Joseph R. Earle, Jr., Barry D. Reagh, William Clayton, Francis T. Dudley, Steven E. Bryant, Upper Street Marketing, Inc., and Project Growth International, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. No. 1.) On April 24, 2023, the SEC filed a second amended complaint against all Defendants. (Doc. No. 59.) On July 14, 2023, Defendant Joseph R. Earle, Jr. (“Defendant Earle, Jr.”) filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Petition in the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.