Ritchie

Ritchie v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20243:23-cv-02163California1,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAQUIN RITCHIE, Case No.: 23-CV-2163 JLS (VET)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. FAILURE TO PAY THE REQUIRED

FILING FEE

ALLYSON HILL and GOLDEN

CREDIT UNION,

(ECF No. 8) Defendants. 16 17 18

Presently before the Court is what was generously docketed as Plaintiff Joaquin Ritchie’s “Notice of Intent to Pay Filing Fee” (“Notice,” ECF No. 8). The Notice includes a single page containing the following message: “Pay to the order of Clerk, U.S. District Court, in the amount of one thousand, one hundred dollars & 00/100.” Notice at 1. The Notice is apparently meant to pay the court filing fee. See id. (“Memo: Filing Fee for Case # 3:23-cv-02163-JLS-VET[.]”). As said fee totals only $405, the Notice adds that “the court can have the excess.” Id. Finally, the Notice is signed by “Ritchie, Joaquin,” “Private & Restricted.” Id. / / / To state the obvious, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.