Morton
Morton v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARILYN MORTON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-1428-MMA-DDL
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants. [Doc. No. 143] 15 16 Marilyn Morton (“Ms. Morton”), as successor in interest to Decedent Joseph Earl Morton’s (“Mr. Morton”) estate, as well as Ms. Morton and Dean Morton as individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the County of San Diego (the “County”), Samantha Macanlalay (“Macanlalay”), Bijan Rahmani (“Rahmani”), Hosanna Alto (“Alto”), Matthew Berlin (“Berlin”), Liberty Healthcare (“Liberty”), and Does 1–10. See Doc. No. 28 (“Third Amended Complaint” or “TAC”). Plaintiffs now seek leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint. The County, Macanlaylay, and Alto (collectively, the “County Defendants”) filed and opposition, to which Plaintiffs replied. See Doc.…