Bey

Bey v. Schneider

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20243:23-cv-01042California810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRITANYA RANITA BEY, Case No. 23-cv-1042-BAS-BGS Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 5) STEVE SCHNEIDER, et al., Defendants. 16 On August 3, 2023, this Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissed the Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 3.). The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than September 5, 2023. (Id.) When Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause, giving Plaintiff additional time to file an amended complaint and warning that failure to file by the new date would result in dismissal of the action. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has now filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 5.) Unfortunately, the Amended Complaint fares no better than the Original Complaint. I. ANALYSIS The Amended Complaint appears to allege copyright infringement against nine 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.