Iula

Iula v. Voos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20243:23-cv-02277California4,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN MARY ASALONE IULA, Case No.: 23-CV-2277 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) DISMISSING

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) JAMES VOOS,

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; AND (2)

Defendant. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

17 (ECF Nos. 5, 6).

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Karen Mary Asalone Iula’s Amended Complaint for Monetary, Declaratory, and Injunctive Relief (“Am. Compl.,” ECF No. 5) and Renewed Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Renewed TRO Mot.,” ECF No. 6). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s submissions and the law, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and DENIES her Renewed TRO Motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action by filing her original Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) on December 14,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.