Ramirez

Ramirez v. Pratt

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20243:23-cv-02175California1,639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN PONCE RAMIREZ, Case No.: 23-CV-2175 JLS (KSC)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

v. PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

AND EXTENDING TIME TO

GLEN E. PRATT, Warden,

CHOOSE OPTION AND SATISFY

Respondent. FILING FEE REQUIREMENT

16 (ECF No. 3) 17 On November 24, 2023, Petitioner Martin Ponce Ramirez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his state court conviction in San Diego Superior Court case number SCN398344. In its December 5, 2023 Order (the “Order,” ECF No. 2), the Court dismissed the case without prejudice based on Petitioner’s failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement and failure to exhaust all claims in the Petition. The Court notified Petitioner that to proceed with the instant habeas case, he must both pay the $5.00 filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.