John Doe v. Regents of The University of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, Case No.: 22-cv-01506-JLS-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND

CERTAIN DEADLINES IN THE

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

CALIFORNIA, and DOES 1 through 10, 15 inclusive, [Doc No. 39]

Defendants.

19 Before the Court is the Parties’ Stipulation to Extend Certain Deadlines in the Scheduling Order Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings (the “Joint Motion”).1 Doc. No. 39. Therein, the parties propose extending eight dates or deadlines. Id. at 4. Based on a review of the Joint Motion and the record, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Joint Motion.

26 Pursuant to Civ. Loc. R. 7.2, the Court construes the Parties’ Stipulation as a “Joint Motion.” See Civ. Loc. R. 7.2 (“Any stipulation for which court approval is sought must 28 I. LEGAL STANDARD In determining whether to modify a scheduling order, the Court considers the…