John Doe v. Regents of The University of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, Case No.: 22-CV-1506 JLS (AHG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE
CALIFORNIA and DOES 1 through 10, DEFENSES inclusive,
16 Defendants. (ECF No. 30) 17 18 19 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff John Doe’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Strike Defendant’s Affirmative Defenses (“Mot.,” ECF No. 30). Defendant Regents of the University of California (“Defendant”) filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 32), and Plaintiff filed a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 33) thereto. The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 34. Having carefully reviewed the Parties’ briefing and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion. / / / / / / …