Danielsen
Danielsen v. Soliz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA DANIELSEN, Case No.: 23cv1936-LL-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL SOLIZ, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Maria Danielsen (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendant Michael Soliz (“Defendant”). ECF No. 1. The Complaint is very brief and lists a claim for “Trespass [forgery] administrating property without right.” Id. at 1. Plaintiff alleges Defendant trespassed on her property and “uttered a forged instrument” that interfered with Plaintiff’s property. Id. Plaintiff provides no detail as to why subject matter jurisdiction is proper in this case. On November 3, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why subject matter jurisdiction is proper and why the Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 4. On December 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed a response. ECF No. 5, Response to Order to Show Cause (“Resp.”). I. …