Price
Price v. Carnival Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
BACKGROUND
23 Carnival, “the world’s largest leisure travel company,” maintains a website at 24 carnival.com where users may browse and book cruises. On carnival.com, no action goes 25 unnoticed. Every click is counted, every keystroke is collected, and every cursor 26 movement is catalogued. Carnival explains that this constant surveillance “improve[s]” 27 the user experience, ECF No. 23 (“Motion to Dismiss” or “MTD”) at 12,1 but Plaintiffs prefer to browse in privacy, and bring suit alleging that Carnival has violated federal wiretap and hacking laws and seven state analogues. Plaintiffs allege that Carnival enlists third-party companies to embed recording software, often referred to as “Session Replay Code,” on Carnival’s website. ECF No. 22 (“First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”) at ¶¶ 1, 67. One such party is Microsoft. Id. at ¶ 51. Microsoft calls its Session Replay Code, “Clarity,” and embeds Clarity on Carnival’s “website, either by directly hard-coding the code on the website or through a third-party platform . . . .” Id. at ¶ 59. When a user visits the website, Clarity is “deploy[ed]” onto the user’s browser. Id. at ¶ 50. …