Roditi
Roditi v. New River Investments Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL RODITI and VENICE Case No.: 3:20-cv-01908-RBM-MSB
BEJARANO,
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
Plaintiffs, OBJECTIONS TO DEFENSE v. EXHIBITS 201–204 AND 206–211
NEW RIVER INVESTMENTS INC., et [Doc. 143] al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On January 24, 2024, Plaintiffs filed objections to Defendants’ trial exhibits numbers 201 through 204 and 206 through 211. (Doc. 143.) Plaintiffs indicate that they sent Defendants written objections on January 17, 2024 but that Defendants failed to respond, necessitating judicial intervention. (Id. at 2–3.) Plaintiffs then argue that Defendants’ exhibits are inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 901 and 604 because they are not authentic English translations of Spanish documents. (Id. at 3.) Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that the Certifications of Translation provided by Defendants are deficient because they do not contain a sworn statement from…