Ritchie

Ritchie v. Chan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20243:23-cv-01715California2,096 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAQUIN RITCHIE, Case No.: 23-cv-1715-JO-BGS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

AND DENYING MOTION TO

LISA CHAN AND WHEELHOUSE

COMPEL ARBITRATION AS MOOT

CREDIT UNION,

15 Defendants. 16

18 On September 18, 2023, pro se Plaintiff Joaquin Ritchie (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint alleging that Defendants Wheelhouse Credit Union and Lisa Chan (“Defendants”) breached their contract, violating their fiduciary duty to Plaintiff under the Federal Reserve Act. Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”). In response, Defendants moved to compel arbitration. Dkt. 4. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and DENIES Defendants’ motion to compel as moot. I. BACKGROUND On October 15, 2020, Plaintiff Joaquin Richie became a member of Wheelhouse Credit Union, a member-owned, non-for-profit cooperative that provides…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.