Jayashankar

Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20243:21-cv-02137California454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC, Case No.: 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PARTIES’

v. MOTIONS TO SEAL

EXOCEL BIO INC., RAJ [Dkt. Nos. 157, 164, 169, 172]

JAYASHANKAR, ALEJANDRO

15 (ALEX) CONTRERAS, and DEB HUBERS, Defendants.

On January 19, 2024, the Court issued oral rulings denying Plaintiff’s motions to file under seal in their entirety Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant Exocel Bio Inc.’s Motion to Quash [Dkt. No. 157] and Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 169]. The Court also issued an oral ruling denying Defendants’ motion to file under seal in its entirety Defendants’ Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 164]. For the reasons stated on the record, the parties have not shown good cause to seal these documents in their entirety. Plaintiff also filed a motion to seal concerning a re-filed exhibit to its Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.