Cruz
Cruz v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIANA CRUZ, et al, Case No.: 3:23-cv-0874-L-KSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER OVERRULING
v. DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO
DISCOVERY ORDER
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES,
Defendants. [ECF NO. 52]
17 Pending before the Court in this putative class action alleging wage and hour 18 violations under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 is Defendant’s Objection to 19 Magistrate Judge's order regarding joint discovery motion. (ECF Nos. 52 ("Objection").) 20 Plaintiffs filed an opposition and Defendant filed a reply. For the reasons which follow, 21 Plaintiff's Objection is overruled. 22 A district court’s review of a magistrate judge’s order on a non-dispositive motion 23 is limited. Rulings on discovery matters are non-dispositive. See 28 U.S.C. 24 § 636(b)(1)(A); Civ. Loc. R. 72.1(b). A district judge may reconsider a magistrate 25 judge's ruling on a non-dispositive motion "where it has been shown that the magistrate's 26 order is…