Macias

Macias v. Lange

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20243:14-cv-02763California270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIKA MACIAS AND CYNTHIA Case No.: 14cv2763-GPC(JMA)

RICH,

ORDER GRANTING JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, CREDITOR’S EX PARTE MOTION v. FOR AMENDED ORDER RE

ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS.

MYRON LANGE,

15 Defendant. [Dkt. No. 238.] 16 17 18 19 Judgment Creditor filed an ex parte motion to amend the Court’s January 23, 2024’s Order Adopting Report and Recommendation Granting Judgment Creditor’s Motion For Assignment of Rents and Restraining Judgment Debtor. (Dkt. No. 253.) Judgment Creditor explains that it learned that the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers for each property needs to be included in the Order for purposes of recordation with the San Diego County Recorder’s Office. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the court may provide a party with relief from an order due to “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). This rule applies to a party’s excusable mistake. See Fid. Fed. Bank, FSB v. Durga…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.