Saville
Saville v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARLON S., Case No.: 23cv2203-CAB-MSB
Plaintiff,
ORDER: (1) DISMISSING
v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AND (2) DENYING
SOCIAL SECURITY
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION,
COUNSEL [Doc. No. 2] Defendant.
17 On December 1, 2023, Plaintiff Marlon S., proceeding in pro se, commenced this 18 action against Defendants “Social Security Administration” for “back payment” and 19 “approval of my claim.” At the time he filed his Complaint, Plaintiff also filed a Motion 20 for Appointment of Counsel [Doc. No. 2] and a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma 21 Pauperis (“IFP”) [Doc. No. 3]. The Court granted Marlon S’s request to proceed IFP on 22 December 5, 2023 [ECF No. 5]. 23 For the following reasons, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT 24 PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED.
28 I. SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) The…