N.R.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 N.R., Case No.: 21-cv-01759-AJB-KSC Plaintiff,

ORDER AFFIRMING DENIAL OF

v. PLAINTIFF’S BILL OF COSTS

DEL MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT, Defendant. 16 17 On January 18, 2024, the Clerk of Court denied N.R.’s (“Plaintiff”) Bill of Costs as untimely. (Doc. No. 121.) On January 26, 2024, Plaintiff filed an “Affidavit in Support of Bill of Costs.” (Doc. No. 124.)1 To begin, the Court declines to construe Plaintiff’s Affidavit as a motion to retax costs. And even if the Court interpreted it as such, it is untimely filed. As noted to Plaintiff in the Clerk’s Order denying costs, her deadline to file a motion to retax costs was within seven days of that Order. (Doc. No. 121 at 2.) See also L. Civ. R. 54.1(h)(1). She did not file until the eighth day and provided no good cause to excuse her lack of diligence. Not

1 Plaintiff’s filing at Doc. No. 123 appears identical except it omits a PACER invoice included in Doc. 27 1 || only does the…