TerVeer
TerVeer v. Doe
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERVEER, JUSTIN, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00150-CAB-LR
CDCR #AL-8458,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT
DOE ISU OFFICERS, et al., TO 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 2] 17 18 19 Plaintiff Justin TerVeer (“Plaintiff”), currently housed at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”), and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1, “Compl.”) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action; instead, he requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a…