Al-Kudsy

Al-Kudsy v. Vons Companies Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20243:23-cv-01065California2,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTHA AL-KUDSY, et al., Case No.: 3:23-cv-01065-GPC-AHG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT VONS COMPANIES INC., et al.,

MOTION TO MODIFY

Defendants. SCHEDULING ORDER, and

16 (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

18 [ECF No. 18] 19 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 18. The parties seek an order from the Court extending the fact discovery deadline by approximately 60 days. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 15 at 5 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); see also Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.