Rhinehart
Rhinehart v. Montgomery
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JOSEPH RHINEHART, Case No.: 22-CV-678 JLS (MMP)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO REVOKE
PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS
W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden;
STATUS
J. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer;
15 and ARVIZU, Correctional Officer, (ECF No. 19) 16 Defendants. 17 Presently before the Court is a Motion to Revoke Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Status (“Mot.,” ECF No. 19), a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof (“Mem.,” ECF No. 19-1), and a Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN,” ECF No. 19-2) filed by Defendants J. Rodriguez and Arvizu (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff Michael Joseph Rhinehart filed an Opposition (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 31) to Defendants’ Motion, and Defendants responded with a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 32). The Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the…