Neill

Neill v. YMCA of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20243:23-cv-00457California545 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGEL MICHAEL NEILL, Case No.: 23-CV-457 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

v. TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

OPPOSITION AND (2) VACATING

YMCA OF SAN DIEGO,

THE MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant. HEARING AND TAKING SAID

MOTION UNDER SUBMISSION

(ECF Nos. 27, 29)

18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Angel Michael Neill’s Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Answer and File Opposition to File Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“Mot. to Extend,” ECF No. 29). Defendant YMCA of San Diego filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“MTD,” ECF No. 27) on January 9, 2024. The Motion to Dismiss was set for a hearing on February 15, 2024. See MTD. Per the briefing schedule issued by this Court, Plaintiff needed to file responsive briefing on or before February 1. See ECF No. 28. Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, now asks the Court 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.